Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Post-Fire Debris Flows

Scientific framing

Post-fire debris flows are fast, destructive mixtures of water and sediment initiated on recently burned steep terrain when short-duration, high-intensity rainfall mobilizes loose material. Wildfire is the conditioning factor: it removes protective vegetation, induces soil water repellency (hydrophobicity), and lowers root cohesion, so that storms far smaller than ordinary landslide-triggering events can generate a flow. This makes them a special case of landsliding in which burn severity (e.g. dNBR) and fire-altered soil properties are first-order inputs — the feature that separates this hazard from the core GAIA shallow/deep landslide susceptibility, which is rainfall- and groundwater-driven and carries no fire term.

State variables & observables

(Burn severity / dNBR, soil water repellency, short-duration rainfall intensity thresholds, sediment supply; seismic/infrasound detection, post-event DEM/lidar differencing for run-out and volume.)

Data — what we ingest

(Link to DataHub: burn severity (MTBS/BAER), high-resolution rainfall, terrain, and the soil layers of Pillar 1. This is the one landslide hazard whose data stack requires a wildfire layer.)

Models

(Link to ModelHub: the Landlab LandslideProbability workflow run with fire-reduced cohesion and burn severity (see Pillar 2 §2.5), rainfall intensity–duration thresholds, run-out modeling, and multi-sensor detection.)

Evaluation & metrics

(Link to HazEvalHub: triggering detection, run-out extent agreement, warning lead time.)

Connection to use cases

The driving use case is the 2025 Stehekin post-fire debris flow; the modeling pipeline lives in gaia-hazlab/landlab-debrisflow.

Open questions & roadmap

References